Document Type: Original Article

Authors

Chabahar Maritime University

Abstract

Since the emergence of the process-oriented approach in second language writing instruction, the issues of writing instruction have been predominantly concerned with what and how error feedback should be given to the students’ writing. The present study investigated the effect of explicit corrective feedback on writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners (N = 44) in Hamedan Islamic Azad University. The three most frequent occurring errors in EFL learners’ writing pre-test were chosen to be targeted. Two groups were formed: the explicit corrective feedback group (N = 22), and the control group (N = 20). Paired samples t-tests revealed that both the explicit and control groups increased their writing accuracy in immediate post-test in comparison with pre-test, but Independent t-test indicated that there was not a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the control and experiment groups (p = 0.65). In delayed post-test, there was no significant differences between writing accuracy of explicit and control groups (p = 0.72). Paired samples t-tests indicated that there was no significant accuracy mean difference between writing pre-test and delayed post-test of the explicit group.The writing accuracy gain of the control group in delayed post-test in comparison with writing pre-test was statistically significant.

Keywords

Beuningen, C. V. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. IJES , 1-27.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. Journal of second language writing, 322-329.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of second language writing , 191-205.
Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Corder, S. P. (1982). Error analysis and inter language. London: Oxford University Press.
Dabaghi Varnosfadrani, A., & Basturkmen, H. (2009.). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 82-98.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Jenefer, P., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, Testing and teaching. North York: Short Run Press Ltd.
Ferris, D. (2004). The “ Grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and Where do we go from here? (and What we do in the meantime.?). Journal of Second Language Writing  , 49-62.

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996)’. Journal of Second Language Writing , 1-11.
Keshavarz, M. H. (1994). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Tehran: Rahnama.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. California: Pergamon Press Inc. Larsen Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language from grammar to grammaring . Canada: Thomson Heinle.
Larsen Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, I. (2003). L2 Writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 216-237.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinel.
Pashazadeh, A., & Marefat, H. (2010). The long-term effect of selective written grammar feedback on EFL learners’ acquisition of articles. Research in Contemporary World Literature 14 (56) , 49-67.
Richards, J. C. (2004). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, & Richards, J. C. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
Truscott, J. (1998). Instance theory and universal grammar in second language research. Second Language Research, 257-291.
Truscott, J. (1996). Review article the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning , 327-369.