Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Payame Noor University, Iran

2 Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran rahimi.tr.tefl@gmail.com

Abstract

The present contrastive study reports a research on a genre analysis of the introduction section of dentistry research articles between English and Persian languages. To this end, 70 introduction sections written in English and Persian and published in wellknown leading journals were examined and analyzed using Swales’ (2004) classification of moves and steps in introduction sections. Frequency and Chi-square test were used to examine the differences between the two corpora of introduction sections. The analysis of the introduction sections shows that Move 1 step 1 “claiming centrality”, Move 2 step 1a “counter-claiming” and Move 3.1 “Announcing present research descriptively and/or purposively” are the most frequently used moves in English and Persian corpora. Moreover, the findings show that the majority of research articles across the two corpora opened with Move 1.1 “Claiming centrality”. Also, results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in certain moves between English and Persian introduction sections.
 

Keywords

"> Abedi, M. (2013).Genre analysis: A comparative generic analysis of conclusions
of English and Persian psychology research articles. Unpublished MA thesis.Shahreza
IslamicAzad University, Shareza, Iran.
Amnuai, W. and Wannaruk, A. (2013). Investigating move structure of English
applied linguistics research article
discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching,
6(2), pp. 1-13. doi: 10.5539/elt.v6n2p1.Atai, M. R. and Fallah, S. (2004). A contrastive
genre analysis of result and discussion sections of applied linguistic research
articles written by native and non-native English speakers with respect to evaluated
entities and ascribed values. Proceedings of the pan pacific association of applied
linguistics (PAAL) conference, Japan.
Bahrami, A., and Riazi, A. (2009). Iranian scholars and scientific publications in
English: Attitudes, problems and strategies.
Paper presented at 7th International TELLSI Conference.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of
research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for
Academic Purposes. 11(2), 134-144. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions.English for specific
purposes, 16(3), 283.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles.English for
Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59.
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in
research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12 (1), 33-43.
Del Saz-Rubio, M. M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and
metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural
Sciences. English for Specific Purposes,
30(4), pp. 258–271.
doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002.

Ershadi, S. and Farnia, M. (2015). Comparative generic analysis of discussions of English
and Persian computer research articles.Culture and Communication Online.
6 (6), 15-31.
Falahi Moghimi, M. and Mobasher, A. (2007). Genre analysis of introduction section of
English and Persian research articles in Mechanics. Teaching English Language and
Literature society of Iran (TELLSI), 1(2), 59- 73
Flowerdew, L. (2015). Using corpus-based research and online academic corpora to
inform writing of the discussion section of a thesis.Journal of English for Academic
Purposes. 20, 58-68.
doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.001
Hastrai, M. (2010). A Genre Analysis of
Persian Research Article Abstracts:
Communicative Moves and Author Identity.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language
Studies, 2(2), 47-74.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the
structure of RA discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes,
16 (4), pp. 321-327. doi: 10.1016/S0889-
4906(96)00038-5.
Hopkins, A., and Dudley-Evans, T. (1988).A genre-based investigation of the discussion
sections in articles and dissertations.English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121.l.
doi:10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: how
far should we go now?.English for specific purposes, 21(4), 385-395.
doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and
professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116-127.
doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003.

0px; "> Khani, R. & Tazik, K. (2007). A Comparative Study of Introduction and Discussion
sections of Sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics Research Articles, Journal of
Applied Language Studies (JALS), 1 (2), 97-122.
Kanoksilapathan, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, and T. A. Upton (Eds.). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure.
Studies in corpus linguistics (Vol. 28, pp. 73–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim Loi, C., Evans, M. S., Lim, J. M, and
Akkakoson, S. (2016). A comparison between Malay and English research article discussions: a move analysis. Sage Open, 1-11. doi: 10.1177/2158244016652925
Lim, J. M. H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based
investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic
mechanisms.Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229-245.
doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002 Lin, L. and Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns
in empirical research articles: a crossdisciplinary study. English for Specific
Purposes. 31(3), 150-160.
doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002
Livnat, Z. (2012). Dialogue, science and
academic writing (Vol. 13).John Benjamins
Publishing.
Marefat H, and Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013).
Genre analysis of literature research
articleabstracts: A cross-linguistic, crosscultural study. Applied Research on English
Language. 2 (2), pp. 37-50.
Martin, P. and Pérez, I. K. (2014). Convincing
peers of the value of one’s research: A genre
analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic
texts. English for Specific Purposes. 34, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2013.09.002
Montgomery, R. (1996). Disciplining or protecting the poor? Avoiding the social costs of peer pressure in micro‐credit schemes. Journal of international development, 8(2), 289-305.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for
specific purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Omidi, L. and Farnia, M. (2016). Comparative
generic analysis of introductions of English
and Persian Physical education research
articles. International journal of Language
and Applied Linguistics, 2(2),1-18.
Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organization of
research article introductions in applied
linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26,
pp. 25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003. Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and
move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for specific purposes,
11(2), 93-113. doi:10.1016/S0889-
4906(05)80002-X
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and
introductions in two disciplines. English for specific purposes, 24(2), 141-153.doi:10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
Stoller, F. and Robinson, M. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary
approach to move analysis with pedagogicalaims. English for Specific Purposes. 32 (1),
45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.001
Swales, J. (1981).Aspects of article introductions.Language Studies Unit,
University of Aston in Birmingham.
Swales,J.(2004).Research genres: Explorations and applications. Ernst KlettSprachen.
Swales, J., andNajjar, H. (1987).The writing of research article introductions. Written
communication, 4(2), 175-191.
Tabatabaei, O. and Azimi, L. (2015). Rhetorical Conventions in the Conclusion Genre:
Comparing English and Persian Research Articles in the Field of Social Studies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6
(6), 372-379.
Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive crossover. English for Specific Purposes. 37, 13-
26.
doi:10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002

Yazdanimoghadam, M. A Contrastive GenreBased Study of the Introduction Sections of
English and Farsi Computer Sciences Research Papers, JELS, 1(2), 103-126.
You, Y. L. (2015). A Genre Analysis on
Academic Business Research Articles. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 7(1), 1-37.