Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of English, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran

2 Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran

Abstract

This study intends to scrutinize the realizations and discourse functions of context frames in  research article abstracts written by native and non-native writers of English from four disciplines namely: Applied Linguistics, Economics, Biology, and Mechanical Engineering. To this end, 200 research article abstracts (50 from each discipline) were selected for analysis. From the 50 research article abstracts of each discipline, 25 were written by native writers of English and 25 written by Iranian non-native writers of English. The corpora, then, were analyzed based on the analytical framework proposed by Ebrahimi (2014). Based on the findings obtained, it can be concluded that the context frame’s selection, frequency and discourse functions are affected and imposed by the nature of discipline and genre of RA abstracts. The result also indicated that there is a difference between native and Iranian non-native writers of English in dealing with these elements. In addition, the findings stress the fact that writing is restricted by the disciplinary conventions and writers’ background knowledge of English language.
 

Keywords

Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation62(4), 428-446.

Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. Papers on functional sentence perspective, 4, 106-128.

Davies, F. (1988). Designing a writing syllabus in English for academic purposes: Process and product. Academic writing: Process and product, 130-142.

Ebrahimi, S. F. (2014). Thematicity in English academic research articles across disciplines in hard and soft sciences, Unpublished PhD thesis, UPM, Malaysia.

Fries, P. H. (1994). Theme, method of development, and texts. World Englishes 21(2), 317- 359.

Gillaerts, P. & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128–139.

Gosden, H. (1992). Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles. English for specific purposes, 11(3), 207-224.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11), 2795-2809.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123-139.

Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to Thematic organization. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature19(3), 1-10.

Khedri, M., Chan, S. H., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies15(3), 319-331.

Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10 (2), 231-251.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(2), 93-113.

Santos, M. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics.  Text16(4), 481-499.

Šauperl, A., Klasinc, J., & Lužar, S. (2008). Components of abstracts: Logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1420-1432.

Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327-341.